« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »

by Sören Stamer March 28, 2007 at 12:21 PM


Die Computerwoche schreibt über Corporate Blogs in der Krise und Klaus Eck hinfragt schnell und gekonnt die journalistische Qualität ihrer Recherche. Was ist also dran an der Krise der Corporate Blogs aus Sicht eines bloggenden Unternehmers?

Kontrollverlust?

Zunächst einmal hat die die Computerwoche vollkommen recht: Für Unternehmen bedeutet der Erfolg der Blogosphäre einen spürbaren Kontrollverlust. Jeder Mensch mit einer eigenen Meinung – oder auch ohne – kann in Minuten einen Blog einrichten und sie für alle nachvollziehbar veröffentlichen. Andere können seine Aussagen in wenigen Minuten aufgreifen, unterstützen, hinterfragen, ablehnen, widerlegen, zerpflücken oder schlicht ignorieren. Die öffentliche Meinung bahnt sich ihren Weg – frei und unkontrolliert. Zukünftig wahrscheinlich noch schneller und intensiver als heute.

Für mich als Unternehmer hat diese Entwicklung einen sehr interessanten, weil weitreichenden Effekt. Man könnte sagen, sie ändert die „Regeln des Spiels“. Die Blogosphäre funktioniert wie eine riesige, extrem schnelle Feedbackschleife. Das Verhalten der Unternehmen wird laufend beobachtet, Abweichungen werden umgehend markiert und Fehlverhalten wird schonungslos aufgedeckt.

Ich bin mittlerweile überzeugt davon, dass Unternehmen durch die Blogosphäre in gewisser Hinsicht zu besseren Unternehmen werden. Unternehmen werden durch die Auswirkungen der Blogosphäre ehrlicher und kundenfreundlicher werden müssen, um zu bestehen – und das unabhängig davon, ob sie selbst bloggen oder nicht.

Unternehmen können natürlich versuchen, gegen diesen Kontrollverlust zu kämpfen. Doch das hat wahrscheinlich denselben Effekt wie schnelles Strampeln im Treibsand.

Hat man sich erstmal an den vermeintlichen Kontrollverlust gewöhnt, kommt man als Unternehmer recht schnell zu der Erkenntnis, dass man zwar keine Kontrolle über den öffentlichen Diskurs hat, aber dennoch Einfluss nehmen kann. Und zwar mit dem gleichen Werkzeug wie alle anderen: einem eigenen Blog. Dort kann man ebenfalls frei und unkontrolliert Themen setzen, Stellung beziehen, Aussagen hinterfragen, Dinge richtig stellen, den Dialog aufnehmen und sich bei Bedarf auch entschuldigen. Und einen Journalisten, der das dann dankenswerter Weise druckt, braucht man dafür nicht mehr.

Mit einem Corporate Blog gewinnt man eine Stimme in der Blogosphäre und kann sich eine eigene Reputation erarbeiten. Die Kontrolle erhält man natürlich nicht zurück. Doch das ist nicht weiter schlimm, denn in einer nicht mechanistischen Welt gilt sowieso: Reputation schlägt Kontrolle.

An dieser Stelle sei auch gesagt, dass ich keinesfalls alle Auswirkungen der Blogosphäre für wünschenswert und gut erachte, sondern einige Aspekte ablehne. Aus der Anonymität heraus andere zu beleidigen, ungerechtfertigt zu beschuldigen oder böswillige Gerüchte über sie in die Welt zu setzen ist eine Plage. Hoffen wir, dass es zukünftig zunehmend von Bloggern erwartet wird, dass sie ebenfalls zu ihren Aussagen stehen und sich als Individuum zu erkennen geben. Erst dann ist ein fairer Dialog möglich.

Engagement Einzelner?

Auch die Feststellung der Computerwoche, dass die Corporate Blogs in der Regel noch am Engagement Einzelner oder Weniger hängt, ist aus meiner eigenen Erfahrung nicht von der Hand zu weisen. Noch ist das vielfach so, auch bei CoreMedia.

Doch das wird nicht so bleiben. Gegenwärtig sammeln eine Reihe meiner Kollegen im Intranet erste Erfahrung beim Bloggen. Es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis sie auch „nach draußen“ bloggen und der Corporate Blog vom Engagement der gesamten Mannschaft getragen wird. Ich freue mich schon sehr auf die ersten Postings von Kollegen auf superdistribution.net.

Agenturen als Ghostwriter?

Von der Betreuung von Corporate Blogs durch Agenturen halte ich überhaupt nichts. Das wird aus meiner Sicht kläglich scheitern. Wer Authentizität aufgibt, entwertet seine Stimme vollends. Dann sollte man lieber nicht bloggen.

Geringe Resonanz?

Das ist richtig, doch das wird sich ändern. Auf den ersten Websites der Unternehmen in der Mitte der 90er Jahre war ebenfalls kaum Traffic zu finden. Heute ist ein Unternehmen ohne eigene Website kaum vorstellbar. Es macht sogar einen recht zwielichtigen Eindruck. Ich überlege mir zweimal, ob ich dort zurück rufe.

Mein Fazit

Für mich und das Unternehmen, das ich vertrete, ist Corporate Blogging und der dadurch eingeleitete gesellschaftliche Wandel eine fantastische Chance. Je enger wir mit unseren Kunden, Partner, Aktionären und der Öffentlichkeit im Dialog sind, desto kundenorientierter werden wir arbeiten. Neben persönlichen Gesprächen sind Blogs dafür bestens geeignet. Ich bin überzeugt, dass wir auf diese Weise viel schneller lernen werden als bisher. Langfristig werden wir nur mit der Qualität unserer Arbeit und unserer individuellen Unternehmenskultur überzeugen können.

In wenigen Jahren werden aus meiner Sicht alle namhaften Unternehmen einen Corporate Blog nutzen, um mit Aktionären, Kunden, Partner und der Öffentlichkeit zu kommunizieren. So kämpft Jonathan Schwarz von Sun bereits dafür, auch seine Adhoc-Pflichtmitteilungen zukünftig fair und transparent über seinen Blog zu veröffentlichen. Es wird so normal sein, wie eine eigene Unternehmenswebsite. Vermutlich wird die Grenze zwischen Website und Corporate Blog dabei sehr fließend sein.

Die Unternehmenskulturen werden sich in der Tat ändern müssen, um mit den gesellschaftlichen Wandel mithalten zu können. Wir werden erleben, wie das organische Paradigma das mechanistische (kontrollorientierte) verdrängt. Das bleibt sicher nicht ohne Folgen. Ich bin schon sehr gespannt.

Und darauf wette ich, bzw. habe ich schon gewettet: Liebe Tina, unsere Wette gilt: In 9,5 Jahren zählen wir die Blogs der Top 100 Unternehmen in Deutschland und schauen, ob ein Großteil davon einen Corporate Blog betreibt. Ich freue mich schon auf den Preis: das „neueste Gerät von Apple“ im Oktober 2016 :-)


2 Comments | 0 TrackBacks | Change Management, Enterprise2.0, Leadership, Web2.0,

by Sören Stamer March 17, 2007 at 07:44 PM


As an entrepreneur it is always a very inspiring opportunity to listen to Ben Verwaayen, the highly successful CEO of BT Group. Ben has managed the turn-around of BT Group and made it a bright star in its segment. Fortunately, he openly shares some of his insights with all of us.

Last Wednesday was such a day to remember - Ben Verwaayen gave the Keynote Speech at the International CeBIT Summit: “Embracing Change – The Untapped Potential of Technology”. Here are some of the insights that resonate most with me:

Choices in a globalized business environment
If you are an entrepreneur, the choice is yours about going global. You can be global at once if you want to, since it is easier than ever to work with people all over the globe, and start a global business. Through the Internet we have more and more options to employ workforces or to buy components anywhere in the world.

The next big thing: “Your time” vs. “our time”
Customers will be in the driver’s seat in the future. They will decide on the right time to access a service. It’s their choice, not ours anymore.

“Open” vs. “locked in”
Services have to be open to enable others to build on top of them and add value. If you try to lock users in you will fail sooner or later. (In a way, Apple looks like an exception to this rule. Well, I tend to believe that Apple knows very well, when and how to open up parts of their closed systems to strengthen their competitive position.)

Demand for “Integrity of an organization”
While we see more and more loosely coupled social groups on the Internet – e.g. Wikipedia with all of their contributors – enterprises have still a very distinct role: they are able to keep the privacy of sensitive information, and they are able to agree and deliver against service level agreements.

Leadership
Every CEO and CIO listening to his speech (or reading blogs) will take a lot of different aspects with him or her. Leadership means to choose. It is the ability to say “No”. Ben made perfectly clear what he meant with this: “Be authentic in your choices and have the guts to follow your instincts.”

Change Management
With regard to successful change management Ben pointed out three aspects: people, tone and risk taking. First, you need the right people at the right places. They have to have personality and meet highest ethical standards. Secondly, the tone of communication matters a lot. Does your style of communication appreciate other opinions, or not? Thirdly, are you and your team willing to take risks?

“Please the boss” vs. “please the customer”
Ben shared with us a great story about a weakness of BT Group as an organization. I guess this weakness is present in every other company as well. People want to please their bosses. Therefore, every idea and proposal is shaped in such a way, that the next level in the hierarchy should accept it. With every other level in the hierarchy things get worse. Therefore, a lot of innovative ideas will be crippled when they meet the eyes of the CEO.

Pleasing your CEO might sound like a good idea, but it’s not. If everyone wants to please the CEO the whole organization is just as smart as one person. “The limitation of your own brain limits the thinking of the whole organization.” You won’t get any unfiltered feedback.

As a leader you have to change this by encouraging people to think freely and have their own opinion. You have to be able to endorse things you do not understand. It is “the art of letting go”.

Harvesting the collective intelligence
BT Group has set up an internal video platform like “YouTube” where everyone can broadcast his/her ideas and get feedback from all over the world. Those ideas that resonate well with other have a good chance to be implemented regardless whether Ben might be a user.

The best input for CEOs
The best input you can get as a CEO is customer feedback. Customers that come to you when things go wrong will give you the deepest insights and an unfiltered view. Therefore, Ben has opened up his e-mail account to every one of BT’s customers.

Be unreasonable
As a CEO you have to stay totally unreasonable. It is a bad sign when you think everything is fine. You always need to have a bit of distance from your own company.

“Stars” vs. “movie directors”
Bosses should not be stars. They should be movie directors that help the stars to shine bright. The real stars are the people in front of the customer.

How to setup a global enterprise?
Distributed intelligence will outperform the client-server approach by far.


Dear Ben,
It has been a great pleasure to listen to your talk. Thank you very much for sharing your insights so openly with us. I am deeply impressed by your leadership and the corporate culture at BT Group. Therefore, I made a choice right after your speech: I want to win you and the BT Group as a customer and partner for CoreMedia. I share your vision and I am absolutely sure that BT’s and CoreMedia’s corporate culture will be a perfect fit.

Best regards,

Sören


0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks | Change Management, Innovation, Leadership,

by Sören Stamer March 17, 2007 at 10:08 AM


Are you part of the avant-garde, too? Those individuals that are always interested in visionary ideas, and innovations? Do you consistently explore the latest trends and try to understand their relevance for our future? Do you love change?

Well, if yes, you certainly know the biggest roadblock for great new ideas: denial.

In a fast changing world like ours, denial is still the rule and curiosity the exception.

The good news is: Peter Sondergaard from Gartner solved this problem for us. So you don't have to be frustrated anymore.

Recently, Peter gave a great speech at the International CeBIT Summit about the "Consumerization of IT". At the end Peter gave everyone in the room some good advice with regard to Web 2.0 and other trends:

1. Get out of denial.
2. Don’t try to stop this.
3. […]
4. Keep an open mind.
5. You ain’t seen nothing yet. (highlights by me)

Peter, thanks for this smart weapon against denial. I tried it yesterday in different situations and it really worked well. Most people opened up their minds and changed their perspective within minutes.


1 Comments | 0 TrackBacks | Leadership,

by Sören Stamer March 14, 2007 at 05:56 PM


Today, I enjoyed a brilliant presentation from Peter Sondergaard, Global Head of Research at Gartner at the International CeBIT Summit, a one day conference “for CEOs and CIOs”.

Peter pointed out that many consumer technologies were rejected by enterprises in the first place: “Who needs an Apple Macintosh or a PC? We have terminals. Who needs a mouse? We have a keyboard. The Internet is only for nerds. Mobile phones are only for top management. WiFi is unsafe.” As a result, enterprises failed to deliver innovative services and produced a lot of frustration for their users.

And this is happening again and again: “I don’t have time to read blogs. Blogging is for teens. Second Life is only for people without a desirable first life.”

Peter made the point that this behavior is dangerous for enterprises since “innovation happens at the edge”. Innovations will flourish somewhere on the Internet, in communities, through mashups and driven by more and more powerful consumer electronics.

In sharp contrast, most IT departments still spend most of their budgets for harmonization of their IT stack, and for complex long-term projects to update their ERP system or to create something unique.

Peter also coined the phrase “Digital Immigrants” for most of the people in the room. Digital Immigrants have a 5 years plan, need manuals to understand technology, have a more directive approach to leadership, and use classical communication patterns. They grew up before the Internet emerged as the universal medium.

Digital Natives” are very different. They do not need manuals to understand technology. I wonder if Digital Natives perceive technology as “technology” at all. They do multi-tasking and parallel processing, use multiple multimedia sources, interact, process pictures, sounds, videos and then text, like random access, learn and act just-in-time, expect instant gratification and instant reward, and practice participative leadership.

Digital Natives like to learn and to do what is relevant, instantly useful, and fun. They will be the workforce of the future.

Digital Natives want services instead of products. Therefore, Peter concluded:“Software is dead.” Software as a service is the way to go.

And enterprises should allow Digital Natives to buy their own devices to do their work. Give them the money and let them decide. As a consequence “IT departments have to support internal as external.” Every access to company information and services might be hostile.

Peter, thanks for your straight talk. It made a difference.


1 Comments | 1 TrackBacks |

by Sören Stamer March 13, 2007 at 09:55 AM


Here is the network that brought dpa and CoreMedia together: Christian Volbracht, one of the chief editors at dpa, wanted to publish information regarding his library of great mushroom books on the Internet. The Internet was the latest buzzword in 1995. He asked Christoph Dernbach for help since Christoph was dpa's IT reporter and therefore very well respected for his insights into IT. Christoph asked Nastaran Matthes, who he knew trough his wife Claudia Musekamp for support. Nastaran, who studied computer science at the University of Hamburg, told Florian Matthes about dpa's request and Florian finally told me about it. However, at the time when I met the team at dpa, the mushrooms were off the table and dpa's future in the Internet era was on the agenda. Thank you all, it has been amazing ever since!


1 Comments | 0 TrackBacks | Anecdotes,

by Sören Stamer March 12, 2007 at 07:17 PM


Until a few weeks ago I thought content is king. It was one of the basic assumptions of CoreMedia. It made us successful in the first place. And it is still the holy grail of most if not all media companies as well. However, now I am sure, content is NOT king anymore. As an entrepreneur I recognized the importance of rethinking your basic assumptions constantly.

Eleven years ago I was a little nervous to have my first meeting with dpa, Germany's leading press agency. For me, dpa was an icon and still is. It is the most trusted source for German news in the world. Fortunately, the meeting went perfectly well. And with hindsight, I must say it was one of the most important meetings in CoreMedia's history.

Why is that? Well, CoreMedia was founded only a few weeks later and dpa became our very first customer. Being a spin-off of the computer science department of Hamburg University, the CoreMedia team had plenty of skills in designing and implementing superior software systems. However, we were still looking for a great problem to solve. Dpa told us about such a hairy beast: the future of multi-channel publishing. However, until we started to work with dpa, we had no clue about the media business at all.

At that time dpa was already in the heart of Germany's media for nearly fifty years. They understood perfectly the art and science of real-time news production and multi-channel delivery. And they made us think of information as a very valuable asset. We learned how to structure information to unleash its potential, how to manage it to process it in real-time, how to create value with content through distributed value chains and how to deliver it fast and reliably to every single customer.

Since then, CoreMedia's focus has been the development of software for real-time multi-channel content infrastructures. And the core idea of our software solutions is still the concept of Content being a very valuable asset as we have learned it from dpa eleven years ago. In other words: dpa has contributed a lot to CoreMedia's core idea by shaping CoreMedia's basic assumptions.

Last week I had the great pleasure to meet the team at dpa. Some of them are friends for more than a decade now. Christoph, Meinolf, Hubertus, Justus, Renate, Gerd and Kalle at dpa-info.com, a subsidiary of dpa, celebrated the tenth anniversary of our mutual project at Saliba, a very nice restaurant in Hamburg. It was great fun to meet them all, to tell war stories about the past and to think about the future. A great evening to remember. Thanks, guys. Thanks, Renate.

I am grateful for dpa's effect on CoreMedia. Now, it is time to reshape our basic assumptions. Let's do it together!


3 Comments | 0 TrackBacks | Leadership,
blog.coremedia.com

Subscribe to superdistribution

ATOM Feed
RSS 2.0

Who is CoreMedia?

CoreMedia is an innovation and technology leader in the market for strategic content technology.
CoreMedia develops innovative technology for intelligent information management solutions.
Visit CoreMedias`Website